ProductShieldMSPPricingCompareBlogDocsStart for FreeSign InTR
Compare · Dynacop vs LoginTC

Dynacop vs LoginTC for Windows Logon and RDP

Both add cloud-managed MFA to Windows console and RDP sign-ins; both work with local accounts without AD and support offline verification. LoginTC is a mature, multi-application MFA product with broader authentication methods and an on-premises option. Dynacop records the real person behind a shared account, blocks attacker IPs on the machine, and offers Windows login free for the first 10 people in a single plan.

This comparison is based on LoginTC's public Windows Logon, methods, and pricing documentation.

The short answer

Choose Dynacop
  • If you want to record the real person behind a shared account
  • If you want Windows MFA and attacker-IP blocking in one product
  • If you want Windows login free for the first 10 people, all features in a single plan
  • If you want cloud-managed simplicity with no extra components
Choose LoginTC
  • If you need broad methods like push, hardware keys, and SMS/phone
  • If you want an on-premises or air-gapped managed deployment option
  • If you also need MFA for many apps beyond Windows, such as VPN, ADFS, and IIS

Sourced comparison

Windows console and RDP MFAParity
Dynacop

Per-person MFA on console and RDP sign-ins

LoginTC

MFA on console (local) and RDP sign-ins

Is Active Directory required?Parity
Dynacop

No; local and domain accounts are supported, cloud-managed

LoginTC

Not required; the docs also support local account/group formats, but the product is positioned around a first-factor directory (typically on-premise AD)

Real-person record on a shared accountDynacop advantage
Dynacop

Each person verifies with their own factor; the record shows the real person

LoginTC

Users are identified by AD/local account. Our assessment: a Dynacop-style per-person record on one shared account is not documented

Breadth of authentication methodsLoginTC advantage
Dynacop

TOTP only (deliberate simplicity)

LoginTC

Push (number matching) · security key/U2F (YubiKey) · hardware token · SMS/email/phone · bypass code · TOTP

Source: logintc.com/pricing/· last verified Jul 19, 2026
Offline verificationParity
Dynacop

Offline TOTP verification (with no internet)

LoginTC

Offline bypass codes and tokens; after the first online login

Auto-blocking a failed-login source in Windows FirewallDynacop advantage
Dynacop

Shield correlates source IP and blocks those over threshold in the machine's Windows Firewall

LoginTC

The docs we reviewed do not document an equivalent behavior that auto-blocks a failed-login source (source IP) in the target machine's Windows Firewall

MSP management modelDifferent approach
Dynacop

Operations console: isolated multi-customer workspaces, license-free technicians, and a customer portal where the end customer sees and revokes their own access

LoginTC

Reseller/MSP program: additional features and pricing discounts (partner request). No customer-facing access portal documented in the docs we reviewed

Source: logintc.com/pricing/· last verified Jul 19, 2026
Deployment modelDifferent approach
Dynacop

Cloud-managed only: lightweight Windows install on the machine → Dynacop cloud

LoginTC

A LoginTC connector on the machine → LoginTC cloud; plus an on-premises managed deployment option (suitable for air-gapped)

Pricing modelDifferent approach
Dynacop

Single plan, per protected person, monthly; first 10 people + 5 computers free. MFA, Shield, Threat Feed, MSP included

LoginTC

The free Starter (3 users) does not include Windows Logon; the Windows Logon connector requires the Business/Enterprise plan — per user, annual, 15-user minimum

Source: logintc.com/pricing/· last verified Jul 19, 2026Check the vendor's pricing page for current plans/figures.

Where they're equal or similar

  • Both add MFA to Windows console and RDP sign-ins.
  • Both work with local and domain accounts (AD not required).
  • Both support offline verification (after the first online login).
  • Both support standard TOTP authenticator apps.
  • Both are cloud-managed with a lightweight component on the machine.
  • Both offer an MSP/reseller program (the management models differ).

Three key differences, in detail

Person ≠ Windows account

Documented fact: LoginTC identifies users by AD or local account; no capability to distinguish individuals within one shared account is documented.

Dynacop assessment: Dynacop resolves identity from the entered code; even when the shared account stays in place, the audit record shows the real person.

Shared-account person resolution →
MFA + attack blocking in one product

Documented fact: the LoginTC docs we reviewed do not document automatically blocking a failed-login source in the target machine's firewall.

Dynacop assessment: Shield does this in the same product — it verifies the authorized user with MFA and blocks the attacker IP on the machine.

Explore Shield →
First 10 people free, single plan

Documented fact: LoginTC's free Starter plan covers 3 users; the Windows Logon connector requires the Business/Enterprise plan (per user, annual, 15-user minimum).

Dynacop assessment: Dynacop offers Windows login free for the first 10 people, and a single plan covers MFA, Shield, Threat Feed, and MSP.

See pricing →

Which is the better fit?

Dynacop may be the better fit

If your priority is the real person behind a shared account, attacker-IP blocking, Windows login free for the first 10 people in a single plan, and cloud-managed simplicity with no extra components.

LoginTC may be the better fit

If you need broad methods like push, hardware keys, and SMS/phone, an on-premises or air-gapped managed deployment, and MFA beyond Windows login (VPN, ADFS, IIS, and many applications). LoginTC is a mature, multi-application MFA product.

Methodology and sources

This comparison is based on LoginTC's public Windows Logon, methods, and pricing documentation and covers only that scope. Each LoginTC statement in a row is taken from the vendor's documentation; the verdicts are Dynacop's assessment.

Last verified: July 19, 2026

Spotted an error? Report it: comparisons@dynacop.com

This is a non-independent comparison prepared by Forty2 LLC based on the vendor's public documentation; it is written by the Dynacop product team. Dynacop is not affiliated with Cyphercor. LoginTC and Cyphercor are trademarks of their respective owner.

Frequently asked questions

What's the biggest difference?

LoginTC is a mature, multi-application MFA product with a broad range of methods and an on-premises option. Dynacop also works without AD, records the real person on a shared account, blocks attacker IPs on the machine, and offers Windows login free for the first 10 people in a single plan.

Can both protect local (non-AD) accounts?

Yes. Both work with local and domain accounts; the LoginTC docs also support local account/group formats. Dynacop is cloud-managed and works in AD or non-AD environments.

Do both work offline?

Yes, both offer offline verification after the first online login. LoginTC does it with offline bypass codes and tokens; Dynacop with offline TOTP.

Is Windows login in LoginTC's free plan?

LoginTC's free Starter plan covers 3 users, but the Windows Logon connector requires the Business/Enterprise plan (per user, annual, 15-user minimum). Dynacop offers Windows login free for the first 10 people.

How current is this information?

The LoginTC statements were verified on July 19, 2026 from the vendor's Windows Logon, methods, and pricing documentation. Products change; we recommend confirming the current state with the vendor.

Your first 10 users are free.
See the difference in your own environment in about 4 minutes.

No credit card required · No minimum purchase